What Is the Relevance of Technology?

“technology in the lengthy-run is beside the point”. That’s what a client of mine instructed me after I made a presentation to him about a new product. I have been speaking about the product’s capabilities and advantages and indexed “modern-day generation” or something to that impact, as one among them. That is whilst he made his statement. I found out later that he turned into correct, at least within the context of ways I used “era” in my presentation. But I started thinking about whether or not he may be proper in different contexts as properly.

What is era?

Merriam-Webster defines it as:

1

A: the realistic utility of information particularly in a specific area: engineering 2 <medical technology>

B: a functionality given via the practical application of knowledge <a car’s fuel-saving technology>

2

: A way of engaging in a project specifically the usage of technical processes, techniques, or information

3

: The specialized elements of a selected area of endeavor <educational technology>

Wikipedia defines it as:

Technology (from Greek τέχνη, techne, “artwork, talent, cunning of hand”; and -λογία, -logia[1]) is the making, modification, utilization, and information of equipment, machines, techniques, crafts, structures, and strategies of business enterprise, so that it will resolve a trouble, enhance a preexisting technique to a problem, acquire a purpose, handle an applied enter/output relation or perform a specific function. It may also talk to the collection of such tools, consisting of equipment, changes, arrangements and procedures. Technology appreciably affect human in addition to other animal species’ potential to govern and adapt to their herbal environments. The term can both be carried out commonly or to unique areas: examples consist of production era, clinical technology, and statistics technology.

Both definitions revolve across the identical element – utility and utilization.

Generation is an enabler

Many humans mistakenly accept as true with it is generation which drives innovation. Yet from the definitions above, this is truely no longer the case. It is possibility which defines innovation and generation which allows innovation. Consider the classic “build a better mousetrap” example taught in most commercial enterprise schools. You may have the generation to build a higher mousetrap, but if you have no mice or the old mousetrap works well, there may be no opportunity and then the era to construct a higher one turns into irrelevant. Ways in Which Technology Is Transforming Procurement Operations
On the other hand, if you are overrun with mice then the possibility exists to innovate a product the use of your technology.

Another instance, one with which i’m in detail familiar, are consumer electronics startup groups. I have been associated with both people who succeeded and those that failed. Each possessed precise leading area technology. The distinction changed into opportunity. Those who failed couldn’t discover the possibility to expand a significant innovation the use of their technology. In truth to survive, these companies had to morph commonly into some thing completely exclusive and if they had been lucky they might take benefit of derivatives of their authentic generation. More regularly than not, the unique technology wound up in the scrap heap. Technology, as a consequence, is an enabler whose remaining value proposition is to make upgrades to our lives. So that you can be applicable, it wishes for use to create improvements which can be driven by means of opportunity.

Technology as a competitive gain?

Many corporations list a generation as one in every of their aggressive advantages. Is that this legitimate? In some cases yes, however In most instances no.

Generation develops alongside two paths – an evolutionary route and a modern course.

A innovative technology is one which allows new industries or allows answers to issues that were formerly no longer viable. Semiconductor technology is a good example. Not best did it spawn new industries and products, but it spawned different progressive technologies – transistor era, included circuit era, microprocessor technology. All which offer lots of the products and offerings we eat today. But is semiconductor technology a aggressive gain? Looking on the quantity of semiconductor corporations that exist today (with new ones forming every day), i’d say not. How about microprocessor generation? Again, no. Lots of microprocessor agencies accessible. How about quad core microprocessor era? Now not as many organizations, however you have Intel, AMD, ARM, and a number of agencies constructing custom quad center processors (Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, etc). So again, no longer lots of a aggressive benefit. Opposition from competing technology and smooth get entry to to IP mitigates the perceived competitive benefit of any precise generation. Android vs iOS is a good example of ways this works. Both operating structures are derivatives of UNIX. Apple used their generation to introduce iOS and gained an early marketplace advantage. However, Google, using their version of Unix (a competing technology), stuck up fairly fast. The motives for this lie not within the underlying era, but in how the products made viable through those technologies had been introduced to market (free vs. Walled lawn, and so forth.) and the variations inside the strategic visions of every employer.

Evolutionary generation is one that incrementally builds upon the bottom progressive technology. However with the aid of it is very nature, the incremental trade is easier for a competitor to in shape or leapfrog. Take as an instance wireless mobile phone technology. Business enterprise V brought 4G products previous to business enterprise A and even as it may have had a brief term gain, as quickly as enterprise A delivered their 4G products, the benefit because of era disappeared. The customer went back to deciding on organisation A or company V based on fee, provider, insurance, some thing, but not based totally on technology. Therefore era might have been relevant within the quick time period, however inside the long time, became inappropriate.

In today’s world, technology tend to quickly emerge as commoditized, and inside any unique technology lies the seeds of its very own demise.

Generation’s Relevance

This text become written from the possible of an stop purchaser. From a developer/designer viewpoint matters get murkier. The further one is removed from the era, the less relevant it will become. To a developer, the technology can appear to be a product. An permitting product, however a product although, and for this reason it is exceedingly relevant. Bose uses a proprietary signal processing generation to enable products that meet a hard and fast of market necessities and for that reason the generation and what it permits is applicable to them. Their clients are extra concerned with the way it sounds, what’s the rate, what’s the fine, and so on., and not a lot with how it’s miles achieved, hence the era used is lots much less applicable to them.

Currently, i was concerned in a dialogue on Google+ approximately the new Motorola X cellphone. Lots of the human beings on the ones posts slammed the telephone for diverse motives – rate, locked boot loader, and so on. There have been additionally lots of knocks on the truth that it didn’t have a quad-middle processor just like the S4 or HTC one which were priced in addition. What they failed to hold close is that whether the producer used 1, 2, four, or 8 cores in the end makes no difference so long as the smartphone can supply a competitive (or even first-class of sophistication) feature set, capability, rate, and person experience. The iPhone is one of the maximum successful telephones ever produced, and yet it runs on a dual-center processor. It still offers one of the nice person reports available on the market. The capabilities which might be enabled by way of the generation are what are applicable to the consumer, not the generation itself.

The relevance of era consequently, is as an enabler, not as a product characteristic or a aggressive gain, or any myriad of different matters – an enabler. Searching at the Android operating device, it is an impressive piece of software era, and but Google offers it away. Why? Because standalone, it does nothing for Google. Giving it away allows other groups to use their knowledge to construct products and services which then act as enablers for Google’s services and products. To Google, it’s wherein the real price is.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

poker99